>>14
Your points were addressed. Your links were shit. You were wrong and now you're taking it personally. You think I don't use or like Scheme, just because I called you out on your baseless Common Lisp complaints. If anything, you hate Scheme since you wrote that every implementation sucks. You seem to be unaware that Mark Tarver, Alexander Burger, and Lutz Mueller have already all tried to make a non-scheme non-common lisp and made significant progress. See Shen, newLISP, and picolisp.
http://www.shenlanguage.org/
http://www.newlisp.org/
https://picolisp.com/wiki/?home
Behold, people who managed to actually do something instead of whine about languages they never really used.