"methinks"
"of late"
"guesstimate"
"Queef"
How southerners always say "whenever" in place of "when."
methinks, of late, whenever guesstimating queaves.
"schmuck"
automatically
"automagically" is top cringe too.
VIP
Machine learning, serverless, microservice, devops, home office, and so on and so on...
mansiere
cringe
empowerment
soykaf
cuck
comfy
kush
kek
problematic
op
gramp
poo
-tard
stank
"phablet" and portmanteau words in general
>>20
Problematique
pissant
performant
cromulent
based
cringe
wholesome
problematic
words in general
>>35
Have you ever had the feeling that words don't belong to you? They're older than you, they will survive you. You didn't invent them. You communicate with words that aren't yours!
>>36
Very slurbent observation.
>>36
Words are very unnecessary.
>>38
Yeah, they can only do harm.
"Words, words, words."
—Hamlet, the Steve Ballmer of Elsinore
awesome
"zero-sum game"
I see it more and more in contexts where it doesn't make sense.
quaint
>>43
"quaint" is an adorable word.
is
I hate no words, but I despise the semites twisting them.
>>46
I get you; Aramaic speakers never pronounce my name right on the first try.
>>47
I was referring to Pilpul.
>>48
Try lojban, goy.
Boogalo.
>>49
Sounds very chinky.
>>49
But the structure is interesting neverthless.
>>51
Goes to show that you aren't acquainted with any language outside Indo-European family.
>>53
If that was the case, how would I recognize the chinky aspect without being familiar with mandarin?
4chan
Coder.
Code is just the result of a programmer programming; its like calling a Chef who makes food a "fooder".
>>56
Good point, "coding" has the same connotation. At the same time, I can relate to it, because "coding" implicitly has a lower value than "programming", and it makes sense because the former just "produces" code, while the latter reasons about programms.
>>56
I've heard an nonnative speaker say that before.
>>56
And "programmer"? Nice try though.
>>59
Programmer is fine.
Care to explain your reasoning on why it isn't?
Using 'code' as a verb used to be informal and hip.
http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/C/code.html
its like calling a Chef who makes food a "fooder".
It's like calling a wizard who makes programs a "programmer".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_compound#The_conservative_tradition
>>62
The key here is that it is ``programs'' with an ``s'' at the end.
That's why it works.
Code is just the result of a programmer programming; its like calling a Chef who makes food a "fooder".
It's not like that at all. Let's examine that analogy:
Food is just the result of a fooder fooding
Can you see what's wrong with that phrase? ``Food'' is never a verb.
But with code:
Code is just the result of a coder coding. Perfectly grammatical and meaningful.
``Code,'' on the other hand, is---can be---a verb.
(There remains the point about whether being the result of coding---programming, as your preference may have it---is all that code is, but we'll not get into that involved topic.)
coding implicitly has a lower value than programming, because the former just produces code, while the latter reasons about programms.
Not so! To programme is to make a programme---be it encoded or in a sloppy form---but not necessarily to understand or reasons through it. Surely a good programmer would---rather, should---but experience suggests otherwise. On the other hand, one might code something other than a programme---a data structure, for instance. But there is a ``higher intellectual level'' associated with programming relative to coding---coding need only make it rigorous, making a good programme is a creative task---perhaps just composing extant programmes, but which? how?
Often something is to be programmed, and coded. One having both abilities may be more effective.
"darkweb"
it really is
>>66
Darkweb contains of sites that are beyond first page of google.
99% of users don't bother even scrolling to the end of page.
>>68
Darkweb is any content that's not hosted on Facebook, Twitter or Instagram.
99% of users aren't even aware of the existence of a ``world wide web''. I don't believe most of them know what that Google Chrome app on their smartphone is for. It looks to them like Hyperterminal in Windows 95: something cool for old school hackers but you don't really know when and why you should use it.
It looks to them like Hyperterminal in Windows 95: something cool for old school hackers but you don't really know when and why you should use it.
Your giving them too much credit.
>>68
>>69
>>70
Any professional in a field which uses the internet knows what a web browser is and that there's a lot of small websites. When people use "darkweb" they're usually referring to the tor network.
71
Or any student who's had to write a research paper.
>>71,72
This common knowledge is great but why did you blindly mass quote?
yikes
"intersectionality"
"Asshat". Never really got it.
"douchecanoe"
Cum
>>78
Coom
>>78,79
Cummy
"Natural". If it exists, it has to be Natural. No?
>>81
Yes but there's usually an abstract paraweapon for arguments like this, philosophers mostly use rasors. I don't know what would be used here. Something about scopes, trying to not touch logical fallacies and make this stale.
>>81
Things that exist are Real. Natural things are those which come from nature, which is more closely meant "created without intent","pre-existing as is","without artificial components".
>>83
All things which come from chaos are chaos, order is an illusion in chaos.
I'm not sure that anything exists without causation. I'm also not sure that man made thing are so far from nature.
The fact that "natural" and "artificial" are so used seems very arrogant of humanity.
App.
Any piece of software is app when merchandized.
I've two I particularly dislike: "proactive" and "gifting". Both are thoughtless inventions carrying the full baggage of the respective generations that invented them.
>>86
I think you're right — perhaps the only thing "artificial" (characterized by artifice) is the Abrahamic myth collectively committing us to the fallacy that we are fundamentally separate from nature.
dank
>>87
Sometimes, in protest of jargon, it's possible to use the word in it's general sense, as suggested by it's composition. ``App'' is short of ``application.'' Originally, informaticists used that term to distinguish a general technique, for example as it is in a code library, from the application of that technique to a particular activity. Really, the term ``appliance'' would be more correct, but there's something aversive about thinking about sophisticated software, with a thing whose only feature is that it gets hot when turned on (a stove top), as the same thing. Of couse, ``app'' might be short for a whole number of other words that start with ``app-'' but there are already many things that are an application of a technique. For example, driving. That's an app. Suck on that jargonistas.
>>86
Everything is natural---in the sense of being in nature. Because nature is everything. The problem is that some persons think that ``artificial'' and ``unnatural'' are synonymous. If it's artificial, it's made by man. Man exists in nature. And all things man made. By derogation, ``natural'' has come to mean ``wild'' or nigh thereof. (Eschew false arrogation.)
There is another sense of ``natural'' I much prefer (the other is nigh useless), that is more about fitting well with environs, or another. Natural landscaping blends in with nature. It's artificial, without clashing with it's environs. Not that such is not necessarily natural in arrogate sense of being nigh wild. Medieval forests were managed, safer for human visitors, with especial care to support the lives by which we profit---berries, mushrooms,, Not wild at all. But natural, in the `fitness' sense.
smexy, hawt etc
>>92
I don't even know anyone who uses these anymore.
>>93
I liek hawt but im p. random lol
rawr x3
>>94
Wew lad clam down, you're scaring away the pray.
phaggot
open-source
Wholesome
>>97
open-source is a meme anyways. Free software is far more important for the programming world, and a lot more sustainable too. The only problem is that people assume that it's free-as-in-free-beer and not free-as-in-freedom.
preggers
fuck you I like methinks
although some people do try to use it at every opportunity
xi jinping
install gentoo
orthogonal
1. "though" when placed at the end of a clause (apparently this is a reddit thing)
2. "personally" when the speaker is stating his/her opinion for which there is no alternative one, e.g. a professional opinion or an official opinion. it is one of many adverbs which is senselessly inserted so the speaker might sound smarter or.
3. "quench"
So much this.
Also, anyone who says "grok" should be thrown into a woodchipper.
1. But position states are not orthogonal to momentum states.
1. "albeit" because it looks like Chinese spelling of "Arbeit"
2. "twink"
albeit macht flei
>>104
Quench,
I
personally
don't
think
so
though.
>>109
┗|｀O′|┛
nailed it with the reddit spacing
>>107
es rebe del albeitel bauel staat
"SJW", "based", "apologist", "hate", "hater", "<insert whatever you come up with>phobia", "<insert whatever you come up with>phobe", "<insert whatever you come up with>phobic", "bigot", "bigotry", "hack" in place of "tip", "boomer", "sex worker", "Make America Great Again", "red pill" (neat theme that has been completely ruined), "luddity" (used mostly by complete ignorants), "content creator", "influencer", "ACAB", "inclusive", "gamer", "gaming", "e-sport" (what the hell!?), "rights"
you OP
neat theme that has been completely ruined
That was the intention.
>>114
Why should it have been? Spoiling it was a side effect, not the objective.
It was definitely the objective. Are you saying the entire top-down effort to co-opt and aggressively promote a concept that most people hadn't even thought about for 20 years was an accident?
>>116
I don't think that was unintentional, I'm saying the intention to claim this specific phrase "red pill", wasn't their end goal.
I didn't say anything about end goals or claiming. I said the intention was to ruin the phrase. Pretty sure we agree here.
>>118
But isn't a "end goal" your intention?
"fugly"
>>112
"<insert whatever you come up with>philia"
NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGEEREGSSSS
>>122
It it annoying, you're right.
word or people?
>>124
What do you mean? This is a thread about words you hate, but I guess the people that say them count too. No easer to be the human equivalent of a fly than by trying to be edgy using racial slurs.
>>125
"human equivalent of a fly"
It doesn't compute. It almost computes, though, which makes it frustrating. Like, the cat equivalent of a dog would be... a loyal cat? Seems off. And flies aren't known to use racial slurs, anyway. At least, I've never seen one do it.
Maybe "moral insect" is what you're aiming at, but that could be interpreted as a well-behaved bug.
portcullis
poo
>>126
A fly is annoying, hard to catch, but not deadly. A racist is annoying, hard to keep quiet, but not subversive. Just like an anarchist, he enjoys superficial provocation, that generate the most backlash.
Behooves
"committee"
i mean just look at all those double letters!
cringe
METHINKS IT'S LIKE A WEASEL
>>133
Thou doth protest too much.
Dicktionary
its like
actually
"Toothsome" and I don't know why but it's been cropping up a bit too often lately.
Toothsome ok tooth some not ok
What the fuck is "toothsome"?
I had to look it up to make sure I hadn't simply imagined seeing the word around but it does exist and to my surprise can apparently be used to describe sexual attractiveness, which only makes it more repulsive.
>>138
See a dentist.
Teeth.
Grapplers ~ what a ugly word.
>>142
You don't like this word to describe the participants of the art of wrestling?
Gafflers is worse.
comeuppance
Lisp and Scheme.
>>143
Wrestlers
"actually". "actual"
Al Gore's Rhythmn
Programming and Solipsism.
Hater!
Windows Update
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/07/report-microsoft-will-return-to-releasing-new-windows-versions-once-every-3-years/
the n word
scheme
Microsoft
Linux
>>156
nigger
>>153
nigger
bloat
why did mods vip you're poast lmao
scale
>>160
nigger