>>58
More specifically pike claims to want a global 9p namespace for unifying the internet with the filesystem, I forgot what blog entry that was but it must of been shitposting and so I posted that in reference, not stating it was your claim. If you want to separate from this and take something that works better in this case the term data oriented networking would work and is agnostic. It's called content centric networking but data oriented describes it better in comparison to what's currently used.
Current networking is designed with reliability in mind but it is highly fragile, adding anymore reliability incorrectly can make it unreliable, I'm not an expert but you can easily test this by shoving another layer ontop of tcp with more reliability then throw it over an unstable connection and watch the scheduler's buffers overflow until the connection breaks while data transfers stall.
Physical data storage also has a crappy stack that has reliability capabilities, with a modern ssd as an example, the ssd's microcontroller can have ecc memory, it's firmware flash filesystem checksums but the top filesystem won't make use of theses. With flash if the filesystem communicated with the firmware you could also have rollbacks.
coincidence
You don't have a loisence for this.